I think it all depends on how you choose to define magic.
Can you articulate what the difference is between Thor being a very long-lived, virtually immortal being who can command the elements from a far-off place, and who was worshipped as a god in days gone by, and Thor being a god? From a practical standpoint, what is the difference?
There’s a methodology to what Doctor Strange does. So on some level, it’s quantifiable, it’s learn-able. It’s study-able. Does that not make it a form of science that we do not yet understand? Or, if not, can you articulate what the difference is, apart from a sense of flavor?
I don’t necessarily disagree with you that there is a difference—but whenever anybody gets to this part of the conversation is where things break down.
mattfromitaly liked this
mattfromitaly said: To be precise, for me Strange can “learn” to play the magic game, but he does it by playing by the rules of Gods (Vishianti) who ARE the power metaphisically. The same is for Thor, he IS the forces of Thunder and Nature antropomorphized.
mattfromitaly said: Well, i Always figured that the “gods” were more an antropomorphic aspect of the forces of nature and of almost metaphisical source. Having them as simply long lived aliens with great unexplainable tech takes away most of the metaphisics, i think…
rasmusskovlykke liked this
greenlanternof2814 reblogged this from brevoortformspring
tarzankingofmars liked this
herecomesthebluelight reblogged this from brevoortformspring
herecomesthebluelight liked this
filipfatalattractionrblog reblogged this from brevoortformspring
brevoortformspring posted this